November 01, 2019
The Securities and Exchange Commission will vote on November 5 to propose new proxy advisory firm regulations, including requirements that would "provide for disclosure of material conflicts of interest and set forth procedures to facilitate issuer and shareholder engagement."
ISS suit: Meanwhile, in the face of these impending requirements, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) filed suit against the SEC, claiming the agency acted in an “arbitrary and capricious” manner in issuing the August 2019 guidance, which, among other things, reminded market participants that proxy voting advice constitutes a proxy solicitation.
Changes to proxy advisory firm exemption: The SEC’s August 2019 guidance reinforced the notion that proxy voting reports issued by proxy advisory firms constitute a federal proxy solicitation. Tuesday’s rulemaking will likely update the conditions of the exemption, which proxy advisory firms can use to avoid the extremely expensive and burdensome requirements associated with being subject to the federal proxy solicitation rules.
Mandatory conflict disclosures, company review of proxy reports: Proxy advisory firms are expected to have to comply with new requirements in order to qualify for the exemption from the proxy solicitation rules. According to reports, the expected requirements are likely to include the following HR Policy-supported changes:
The details of how each of these proposed requirements will work—if they are included by the SEC—will be revealed at Tuesday’s open meeting and would then be subject to a 60-day comment period.
ISS lawsuit a pre-emptive strike: According to a press release issued Thursday, ISS's lawsuit against the SEC contends August's Commission-level guidance was issued without a formal rulemaking process. Interestingly, during the August meeting, Democratic SEC Commissioner Allison Lee blasted the use of guidance, stating a rulemaking should have been conducted. SEC Chairman Jay Clayton called on the SEC’s general counsel, who opined that a rulemaking was not needed.
ISS’s lawsuit also contests the guidance’s statement that proxy voting advice is a proxy solicitation. If ISS is not subject to the proxy solicitation rules, the proxy advisor would not need to comply with the anticipated new requirements to be exempt from the rules.