Companies are taking a hard look at executive security after the tragic murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in Midtown Manhattan.
Why it matters: A focus on safety is crucial in an era of distrust, availability of firearms, and online access to personal and location information for corporate executives.
By the numbers: An HR Policy pulse survey conducted after the murder found 73% of members provide executive security and over half plan to enhance security in the next 12 months (results preliminary; final forthcoming).
The big picture: The incident has prompted boards and management to scrutinize existing security measures.
A recent HBR piece highlights key questions companies should be asking about threat levels, vulnerabilities, and consequences.
Disclosure and tax issues: Inconsistent IRS and SEC guidelines may pose challenges to beefing up executive security.
The IRS allows an exclusion from wage income if an “overall security program” is established and there is a “a business-oriented security concern.”
But the SEC offers no such exclusion – security outside the office is considered a perk and must be included in total pay in the proxy.
ISS continues to scrutinize perks, but rarely recommends against a company’s Say on Pay vote based on high security costs.
What’s next: As companies review security plans and update crisis management approaches, stay tuned for our upcoming detailed survey results on current and future executive security arrangements.
Ani Huang
Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Content Officer, HR Policy Association
Contact Ani Huang LinkedIn