Last week, the Irish Labour Court held a fourth day of hearings on the Verizon EWC dispute. A further half day is scheduled for July to hear closing arguments. Much of court discussion focused on what is “training” and who is entitled to decide what training is required
Why it matters: The dispute revolves around definitions of 'training' and who can determine the necessary training. The Irish Subsidiary Requirements state that members of an EWC should receive appropriate training without loss of wages.
The detail: The dispute involves a refusal to pay the costs of the chair of the EWC for attending a training program organised by the EWC Academy, which also acts as the expert advisor to the EWC. The chair was told in advance that the company would not pay costs as the company had already organised collective training for the whole of the EWC
The bottom line: Precise agreements and adherence to their terms are crucial to avoid lengthy court battles. Getting EWC agreements right from the start is crucial.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Report on the hearings in IRN, here (paywalled)
![](/HRPolicy/media/Headshots/Staff/Hayes-Tom-400-x-400-RGB.jpg?ext=.jpg)
Tom Hayes
Director of European Union and Global Labor Affairs, HR Policy Association
Contact Tom Hayes LinkedIn