The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.
HR Policy this week filed an amicus curiae brief with the Fifth Circuit urging it to overturn a National Labor Relations Board ruling that seeks to regulate alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in non-union settings. Under the rubric of protecting "concerted activity," the Board in D.R. Horton ruled that restrictions against class actions in non-union arbitration agreements violate the labor laws. Our brief, filed by our outside labor counsel Roger King of Jones Day, states:
Regulating the terms of individual nonunion dispute resolution agreements does not relate in any way to the Board’s core mission of protecting employees’ rights to organize and bargain collectively. Indeed, as a matter of national labor policy, the Board’s decision herein evidences a lack of understanding of the significant role that alternative dispute resolution procedures play in today’s workplace and the decades of substantial support that such procedures have received from all levels of the judiciary and from employees, employers and labor organizations alike. Such dispute resolution procedures reflect the reality of the workplace where informal and expeditious problem solving mechanisms have been instituted to avoid the often expensive and protracted nature of litigation.
Daniel V. Yager
Senior Advisor, Workplace Policy, HR Policy Association